Ethics Misinformation Privacy0 sources· Running 235 days· Last updated Oct 2, 2026

Grammarly's Expert Review Feature Faces Backlash and Lawsuits

Why It Matters

The developments surrounding Grammarly's 'Expert Review' feature highlight critical issues of consent and identity in the age of AI, affecting not only the individuals misrepresented but also the broader landscape of content creation. As AI tools become increasingly prevalent, the ethical use of personal identities and the potential for misinformation must be addressed to protect privacy rights. This incident serves as a cautionary tale for other companies developing AI technologies, emphasizing the importance of transparency and user consent.

Summary

Grammarly's 'Expert Review' feature, launched in August 2026, has sparked widespread ethical outrage by using the identities of renowned authors and experts without their consent. This AI-driven tool claims to enhance user writing by providing feedback inspired by well-known figures, including deceased academics and living professionals. Many of those named, including journalist Julia Angwin, were unaware of their inclusion, leading to a class action lawsuit against Grammarly for violating privacy and publicity rights. As criticism mounted, Grammarly announced it would discontinue the feature, which had initially been intended to operate unless individuals opted out. The controversy has raised significant concerns about the ethical implications of AI in content creation, particularly regarding personal identity and consent, and has underscored the urgent need for clearer regulations and ethical standards in AI applications.